Friday, November 14, 2025
spot_img
More
    HomeNews & AffairsPakistan 27th Constitutional Amendment Saga Takes a Wild Turn

    Pakistan 27th Constitutional Amendment Saga Takes a Wild Turn

    The Day When the Senate became a stage and the Constitution Cried — Pakistan 27th Constitutional Amendment passed with two-thirds majority

    In the latest episode of Pakistan’s never-ending political drama-a show now running longer than most PTV classics-the Senate passed the 27th Constitutional Amendment with a two-thirds majority, and they did so when the opposition was busy tearing papers, chanting slogans, and storming out like contestants eliminated from a reality show.
    The government called it “historic.”

    The opposition called it “catastrophic.”

    The Constitution didn’t get to vote, but it certainly took a hit.

    This parliamentary session, if ticket sales were allowed, would have outsold PSL playoffs.

    A New Star Is Born: Chief of Defense Forces

    It does so by boldly rewriting Article 243, introducing a shiny new role: Chief of Defense Forces (CDF). Think of it as adding a new lead actor while quietly retiring an old one. Goodbye, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee — you served well, but the scriptwriters wanted a plot twist.

    Under the new setup:

    • Army chief will become the constitutionally recognized head honcho of all armed services.
    • The president has the ceremonial honor of appointing service chiefs — but only after the prime minister has whispered the right names.
    • If power dynamics had feelings, they would be feeling rearranged.
    • If institutions had personalities, some would be side-eyeing others.

    A Constitutional Court Appears — The Supreme Court Reacts

    The amendment also births a brand-new constitutional court-an idea that has left many former judges clutching their robes dramatically.

    A number of senior retired judges and top lawyers have written a rather emotional letter to Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, the kind of letter usually reserved for breakups or farewell notes, warning that the amendment might “permanently denude” the Supreme Court.

    The opposition dubbed this the greatest threat to the Supreme Court since 1956 and also called it the most radical restructuring since the Government of India Act of 1935. When lawyers begin comparing amendments with colonial-era laws, you know things are getting tense.

    The signatories demanded an immediate Full Court meeting so the judiciary may hold an institutional intervention before Parliament finalizes the makeover.
    Judicial Independence vs. Constitutional Redesign: The Season Finale Promises Drama by Rustom Dastoor!

    The NFC Award Gets a Makeover — Provinces Hold Their Breath

    It revolves around the amendment to the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award that prescribes the sharing of federal revenues with the provinces**-that’s basically Pakistan’s financial bone, and everyone wants the biggest piece.

    Provinces see any tampering with the NFC as a threat to fiscal autonomy.

    The federal government refers to it as “clarifying the system.”

    Observers see it as stirring a hornet’s nest.
    Nothing inflates tension faster in federal politics than money — possibly excepting surprise constitutional changes on a Monday morning.

    Parliament, But Make It Theatrical

    The proceedings in parliament were broadcast live — thankfully, because the performance deserved an audience.

    Here’s how it went down:

    Opposition members tore up copies of the amendment like students discarding exam results.

    • They threw papers in the air, confetti style, except nobody was celebrating.
    • They chanted slogans loud enough to drown the microphone feed.
    • Then they dramatically marched out and left the government to pass the bill in peace.

    Senate Chairman Yousuf Raza Gilani presided over the voting with equanimity, perhaps thinking he should invest in noise-canceling headphones.

    When the dust settled, he announced:

    “64 members are in favor… none against.”

    Because… well… the “against” had already left the building.

    A Quick Throwback: the 26th Amendment
    Context matters, and so does continuity.

    The 26th Amendment of 2024 had already stirred the pot by:

    • Giving Parliament a role in the appointment of the Chief Justice
    • Creating a senior judges’ panel to try constitutional cases
    • Critics cried foul, claiming that judicial independence was taking a hit.

    The 27th Amendment now adds:

    •  A constitutional court
    • Institutional restructuring
    • Symbol Explanation Service command changes
    • If amendments were seasons of a show, critics would call this a “darker, grittier reboot.”

    Opposition parties have termed the amendment as:

    “An attack on democracy”

    • “The end of judicial independence”
    • “The death of the 1973 Constitution”

    One emotional critic even declared:

    “RIP Constitution 1973–2025.”

    Harsh, but dramatic flair is a political tradition.

    The ruling party says these changes come straight out of the 2006 Charter of Democracy – the holy scripture of bipartisan reform aspirations from kinder, simpler times.

    So… What Happens Next?

    The amendment still needs approval from the National Assembly. But judging from political alliances and from the confidence of the government, the numbers may already be in their pocket.

    • If passed, it would alter Pakistan’s institutional topography in fundamental ways:
    • Military leadership becomes constitutionally stronger
    • Judicial powers get redistributed
    • Renegotiation of provincial finances

    A new court enters the scene Or, in other words, it’s a fundamental renovation of the governance architecture, regardless of whether there was consensus on the blueprint or not. When referring to a noun that identifies a particular individual or thing, use the number one.

    A Constitution Walks Into a Bar If constitutions had personalities, the 1973 document of Pakistan would be sitting in a quiet corner of a café, sipping tea and whispering: “I’ve been through enough.” From martial laws to judicial activism, from 18th Amendment empowerment to today’s proposed restructuring, it has survived more revisions than a Pakistani wedding guest list. The 27th Amendment, with its sweeping institutional reconfigurations, is perhaps the boldest redesign yet. Whether it will eventually prove to be a milestone or a cautionary tale-well, that depends upon Act II. Until then… stay tuned, stay informed, and maybe keep a tissue handy! Because in Pakistan, even the Constitution gets emotional.

    For more news and analysis, visit Pakistan Updates.

    RELATED ARTICLES
    - Advertisment -spot_img

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments